The developer noted unawareness of GitHub Copilot Review's capability to alter user-generated descriptions and comments, questioning the legitimacy of such functionality.
Mostly I think this is a situation where you can’t have it both ways. It seems to be widely agreed among advocates of LLM coding that it’s a skill which requires significant understanding, practice, and experience before one is able to produce consistent useful results (this is the basis of the “adopt now or be left behind” claim dealt with in the previous section); strong prior knowledge of how to design and build good software is also generally recommended or assumed. But that’s very much at odds with the democratized-software claim: that someone with no prior programming knowledge or experience will simply pick up an LLM, ask it in plain non-technical natural language to build something, and receive a sufficiently functional result.
，推荐阅读搜狗输入法获取更多信息
Свежие репортажи
Дацик раскрыл обстоятельства гибели сына в зоне СВО20:47